Evaluation Argument Topics

Evaluation Argument TopicsEvaluation argument topics cover a broad range of topics and are used in evaluation of ideas, theories, cases, and the like. The topics can vary according to the type of evaluation argument that needs to be used. In this article, we will discuss the variety of topics that can be used in evaluation.Evaluation method - The method of evaluation is a process for evaluating ideas, theories, cases, and so on. This involves testing the material on different levels of analysis. First, the theory or concept is tested on logical, empirical, and/or historical grounds. Next, the empirical and logical grounds are further evaluated on the level of practical value. Finally, the theoretical and practical levels are used to evaluate the case.Critical Evaluation - Critical evaluation is a critical analysis and evaluation of the whole argument. In this situation, there is no effort to make arguments or theories. Instead, what is being critiqued is the premises of the argument. The main thing in a critical evaluation is the relevance of the premise to the conclusion. The main goal of this approach is to find flaws in the argument to show the flaws of the argument.Open-Ended Evaluation - A critical evaluation will use open-ended questions to ask about the merits of the argument. A justified answer to the open-ended question will show the justification of the argument and will help the person to assess the relevance of the conclusion to the whole argument. The major idea of an open-ended evaluation is to see whether the conclusion follows logically from the premises or is unsupported by the evidence.Close-Ended Evaluation - A close-ended evaluation will use a technique called a dissection of the argument. With this technique, it will require an appraisal of the fact that the person has reached a particular conclusion based on the logical argument.Circumstantial Argument - Circumstantial arguments are those that require the conclusion to have been reached th rough logical considerations that led to the conclusion. It will require a priori reasons for supporting the conclusion. To achieve this, it will require a generalization, inductive reasoning, and inductive logic.Introduction Argument - An introduction argument is one that begins with a point that requires examination and discussion. It is a strategy for presenting a new argument to an audience. The purpose of introduction arguments is to inform the audience about the topic being discussed.Examples - A popular and powerful evaluation technique is to use examples to support the conclusions. Usually, the examples used in argumentative exercises will need to be supported by general knowledge or factual information. Using examples also forces the reader to think about the argument in order to support or invalidate the conclusion.