Arthur Millers Presentation Of John Proctors Moral Journey Essay

Examine Arthur Millers Presentation Of John Proctors Moral Journey - The Crucible by Arthur MillerThe Crucible by Arthur Miller is a play base upon an Americansettlement during the late 1600s. It is centred around executionual eventsfrom history to evaluate to portray the way of life in this era. Miller haschosen the perplexity of the witch trials of this time, to provide abase for the struggles of his principal(prenominal) character, John Proctor.At the beginning of the play the focalization is laid main(prenominal)ly on introducingthe main characters and storyline, but as the script unfolds, itbecomes clear that John Proctor is the main character, roundthing notimmediately obvious from the beginning. It is how Miller presents anddemonstrates Proctors moral journey throughout the play, and thedifferent channels he uses to do this that I will focus on.Act One really only sets the scene for the play by portraying thedifferent characters in the Salem and how their ways of life wandermostly around the church and their religion. The inhabitants can forthe most part be sectional off into three groups the establishedfigures, eg. Rev. Parris the citizens, and people who have in possiblenessearned their status, eg. Francis and Rebecca Nurse and theoutsiders, eg. Rev. Hale. This set-up seems to work well until theevents of the play, when people become separated by their views, andeveryone begins blaming others for their shortcomings in order tomaintain their authority and status. The main power in the villagebeing the church, naturally the Rev. Parris will do anything to keephis position, particularly as Miller informs us that his character feelsthat for some reason everyone in the world is against him, and hislife is jus... ... which he wasinnocent. At the very end, when he knew what would get to him,Proctor refused to publish a lie about himself, or appropriate to a sin hedid not commit. This shows at least some remnant of pride was left,even after every thing he had been through - and this is what saves himin the end. It makes him realise that John Proctor wasnt as evil ashe had thought, that, like everyone else, he was a mixture, and nowwith absolutely nothing to hide. Possibly, this act may cancel outJohns adultery, especially as there is a lot of confusion around whatare actually evil acts, and what are unspoilt natural flaws andinstincts. Elizabeth says right at the end of the play,He have his commodity now. God forbid I take it from him..This suggests goodness and reconciliation in Proctors act, as theonce shallow and indecisive John, is finally decisive.