Discuss how far sociologists would agree that teenage criminal and deviant behaviour results from parents failing to socialise their children correctly Essay

Discuss how far sociologists would defend that immature reprehensible and abnormal deportment results from p bents failing to socialise their tiddlerren correctly (12 marks) Most criminologists would nurse that the majority of criminal and/or deviant behaviour both stems and/or develops during either childhood or the early years of adolescence. Therefore, many how deduced that the adequateness of socialising in the home by pargonnts is likely to name an impression and possible fifty-fifty result in teenage criminal and deviant behaviour.This essay will therefore discuss how far sociologists would take hold that teenage criminal and deviant behaviour results from parents failing to socialise their children correctly. According to functionalists, nonpareil of the key roles of parents is to appropriately socialise children to become good citizens of society. However, in connecter to this, it has also been theorised that ruin to appropriately socialise a child at home may l ead to criminal and/or deviant behaviour later on in life. This may be that the parents them selfs display criminal and/or deviant behaviour, which that child them copys and learns.The new right approach for example theorises that children from a parentally deprived home are more(prenominal) likely to look for guidance and simpleness elsewhere and are more prone to crime. They are therefore more likely to find role models in such situations who they aspire to rise up like. The Marxist system of alienation however is another divisor that sociologists have recognised. Marxist theorise that young, impressionable adolescences often feel pressurised by those in power who often use the law to benefit themselves and are therefore forced in to demeaning work.Due to this, many publish to crime in order to be able to control what they do but also get certain objects that they may not have been able to receive should they have stayed on the other side of the law, objects which the adequ ate and powerful are usually the only ones to receive. Therefore, Marxists would agree that while failure to properly socialise children is an important factor in why striplings drama to crime and delinquency, the oppression of the bourgeois is just as far reaching. In regards to teenage behaviour, labelling is a common factor found right crossways the board. Whether it is in school, in peer groups, in the neighbourhood or even in the home, labelling can eventually lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy.If a child is labelled as a delinquent early on in life, it is extremely likely that that child will eventually become to retrieve it they are told it enough. They will therefore begin in act as they have been labelled and become criminal and/or deviant. Many sociologist would agree that labelling is a major factor in why teenager criminally and/or deviantly. Another factor is peer pressure within a sub-culture. Sub-cultures are a common day thing in many environments, especially in school. Most of them in areas of material and capital going have developed a laddish sub-culture, where you must be tough and disenfranchised in order to be popular where as those who do well in academics are often viewed as uncool and nerdy.Therefore, many teenagers are pressured in to behaving criminally and or/deviantly by the threat of being socially outcast and labelled as uncool by their peers. Therefore, many sociologists would agree that peer pressure within a sub-culture does affect the criminal and/or deviant behaviour of teenagers today, possibly more so than poor assimilation in some situations. In this essay, I have explained four several(predicate) factors that can affect how deviant and/or criminal teenagers behave in todays society. However, although poor parenting may result in teenager criminal and deviant behaviour, other factors such as the Marxist theory of alienation, labelling and peer pressure within a sub-culture affect teenagers just as much as poor s ocialisation by parents.